On April 5, an interpellatory session regarding the Trans-Pacific
Partnership Agreement (TTP) and related legislation took place in
the plenary session of the House of Representatives. DP
Policy Research Chair Shiori Yamao asked questions on behalf of the
party.
Prior to
beginning her questions, Yamao made the following appeal on behalf
of the new party: “The Democratic Party aims to listen to the voice
of the people, speak with the voice of the people, and move forward
with policies together with the people.”
Yamao
stated that the LDP had broken pledges made in the 2012 election
manifesto, and urged them to face the electorate honestly, stating:
“They should admit that they have not kept the promises made at the
time of the general election, and explain the reason for it.”
She went on to express strong disapproval toward the behavior
of successive LDP ministers, saying, “Former Minister of Economy,
Trade and Industry Amari, who was the prime mover in TPP
negotiations, has continued to be absent from the Diet.
Moreover, current Minister Ishihara had publicly stated his
opposition to the TPP before his appointment. Discussions
that will receive a public mandate are not possible when we have a
flip-flopping Minister making empty speeches with borrowed
wisdom.”
Yamao
went on to comment on the fact that of the five important items
designated as “sacred” in TPP negotiations between Japan and the
U.S., 30% had been made duty-free or subject to reduced duties,
saying, “It is going too far to make bold statements to the effect
that the ‘sacred’ items have been safeguarded and the national
interest protected.” Regarding the influence on the farming,
fishing and forestry industries, according to preliminary
calculations by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and
Fisheries, imports would increase once the TPP came into effect,
but despite Japan’s decreasing population, production levels would
not change. Yamao said that these calculations needed to be
redone, stating, “The administration is not looking directly at the
real situation in the agricultural industry, and is looking to
abandon our farmers.”
Yamao
went on, “No records have been kept, the negotiating process cannot
be scrutinized, and the government has been forced to remove
tariffs on a considerable number of the ‘sacred’ items. In
the automobile industry, where Japan has a strong position, we have
had to make large-scale concessions. To engage in aimlessly
debate in the Diet under such circumstances would be dishonorable.
The DP pledges to closely investigate during the debate in
this Diet session just how much the Abe administration’s pride and
arrogance is damaging the national interest and threatening the
day-to-day lives of citizens.